That’s how marketplaces work, how proper change happens. And keep in mind that if enough people get frustrated by a game maker’s chosen DRM and stop buying games equipped with it then the publisher will likely be forced to abandon it. People who make stuff to be sold have a right to protect that stuff in whatever legal ways they like. (Note that whether you ought to have the right to modify a product after purchasing it is a completely different discussion.) That’d be like saying if you don’t like the way an automobile manufacturer has tuned a car’s performance it’s okay for you to steal the car to punish them. There’s no question intrusive DRM is a nuisance, but it’s still not an excuse to steal what’s not yours. Article contentĪnd I’m not swayed one bit by the argument that hackers are only stealing games because they have “intrusive DRM,” meaning the security software affects the quality of the experience by forcing players to, say, always be online in order to play (and that’s not what Denuvo does, anyway). This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |